Daily Digest #03: Michael Mauboussin on Valuation Multiples

Date: 2024-04-24

The article from Consilient Observer by Michael J. Mauboussin and Dan Callahan, published on April 23, 2024.

It focuses on the effectiveness and limitations of valuation multiples like P/E (price-earnings) and EV/EBITDA (enterprise value to earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation, and amortization) in financial analysis.

Michael Mauboussin on Valuation Multiples

It highlights a common practice among analysts of using valuation multiples for pricing companies rather than delving into a detailed valuation based on the discounted cash flow (DCF) model,

which considers future cash flows and fundamental business attributes.

A significant percentage of analysts prefer market multiples, indicating a possible oversimplification in financial analysis approaches.

The paper discusses several key issues:

  1. What Multiples Miss: Multiples compress complex financial assumptions into a single figure, often missing out on crucial factors like the sustainability and level of return on invested capital (ROIC), and the risk profile of the firm. These omissions can lead to misrepresentations especially as investment patterns shift from tangible to intangible assets, which are expensed immediately rather than capitalized, affecting earnings reports and consequently, multiples.

  2. Differences in Multiples: The P/E and EV/EBITDA multiples can sometimes give conflicting signals about a stock’s value. This divergence can be attributed to various factors such as differences in capital structure, non-operating expenses, and tax treatments, which can significantly affect the computed multiples.

  3. Role of Intangible Investments: The shift towards intangible investments like R&D and branding has distorted the ability of multiples to reflect true economic value, as these costs are typically expensed immediately, reducing reported earnings but not necessarily reflecting poor business performance.

  4. Impact of Adjusted Measures: The use of non-GAAP financial measures to potentially enhance the appearance of a company’s financial health is critiqued. While sometimes providing useful information, these measures can also mislead if not properly contextualized, especially when excluding legitimate expenses like stock-based compensation.

  5. Guidance on Multiples Usage: The document advises caution in using multiples without understanding the underlying business drivers and economic realities. It suggests integrating multiple valuation methods and maintaining a keen awareness of the assumptions embedded in any financial analysis.

In summary, while valuation multiples can provide quick insights, their effectiveness is limited without a deeper understanding of the company’s fundamental financial health and investment strategy. The increasing complexity of business models, especially with the rise in intangible assets, demands a more nuanced approach to valuation than multiples alone can offer.

Related Article

👉Daily Digest #01: Modeling life, underatanding power and Gautam Baid’s talk

👉Daily Digest #02: The minimalist entrepreneur Course, RBS and VIC